Wyatt v. State
This text of 133 S.E. 749 (Wyatt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An indictment for larceny describing the property as “one nineteen-twenty model Studebaker Automobile windshield, taken from garage of J. J. Jordan on Church Street, Dublin, Georgia,” is a sufficient description of the property alleged to have been stolen to withstand a special demurrer which attacks the indictment upon the ground that the property alleged to have been stolen was not sufficiently described. The indictment is not subject to the demurrer urged.
2. The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction. The court, - approving the verdict of guilty, properly overruled the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 S.E. 749, 35 Ga. App. 483, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-state-gactapp-1926.