Wyatt v. Harden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Wyatt v. Harden

30 F. Cas. 722

DecidedAugust 15, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. Cas. 722 (Wyatt v. Harden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyatt v. Harden, 30 F. Cas. 722 (Ark. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The judgment in this case must be reversed ujion two grounds: (1) The court erred in not allowing the appellant, the defendant in the court below, until the next term to plead, after a substantial amendment of the declaration had been made. (2) The court erred in permitting any evidence to go to the jury in relation to a ferry, as a disturbance of or injury done thereto would constitute the ground of a separate action. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The judgment in this case must be reversed ujion two grounds: (1) The court erred in not allowing the appellant, the defendant in the court below, until the next term to plead, after a substantial amendment of the declaration had been made. (2) The court erred in permitting any evidence to go to the jury in relation to a ferry, as a disturbance of or injury done thereto would constitute the ground of a separate action. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. Cas. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-harden-ark-1822.