Wyatt v. Harden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Wyatt v. Harden

30 F. Cas. 722

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided August 15, 1822·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The judgment in this case must be reversed ujion two grounds: (1) The court erred in not allowing the appellant, the defendant in the court below, until the next term to plead, after a substantial amendment of the declaration had been made. (2) The court erred in permitting any evidence to go to the jury in relation to a ferry, as a disturbance of or injury done thereto would constitute the ground of a separate action. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The judgment in this case must be reversed ujion two grounds: (1) The court erred in not allowing the appellant, the defendant in the court below, until the next term to plead, after a substantial amendment of the declaration had been made. (2) The court erred in permitting any evidence to go to the jury in relation to a ferry, as a disturbance of or injury done thereto would constitute the ground of a separate action. Reversed.

Wyatt v. Harden, 30 F. Cas. 722 (Ark. 1822).

Pincite

30 F. Cas. 722 (Wyatt v. Harden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.