Wyatt v. City of University City

255 S.W.3d 538, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2008 WL 2421093
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 17, 2008
DocketED 90466
StatusPublished

This text of 255 S.W.3d 538 (Wyatt v. City of University City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyatt v. City of University City, 255 S.W.3d 538, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2008 WL 2421093 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mindi Wyatt (“employee”) appeals the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the City of University City (“University City”) on her petition for writ of mandamus. Wyatt argues the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because she was not provided with adequate notice regarding the reasons for her termination from employment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bannister v. Pulaski Financial Corp.
255 S.W.3d 538 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 S.W.3d 538, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2008 WL 2421093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-city-of-university-city-moctapp-2008.