Wyatt v. City of Raleigh

90 S.E. 213, 172 N.C. 847, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 423
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 18, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Cukiam.

The only assignment of error relating to the evidence is to that of George M. Harden, who testified as to the condition of the streets of Raleigh on the morning that the accident occurred, and it is without merit. The other assignments of error, six in number, all relate to the first issue, referring to the alleged negligence of the defendant.

The said assignments are without merit. The charge is a clear and correct presentation of the well settled principles of law applicable to this case. But if the charge was in some respects erroneous, as contended by the plaintiff, it would not matter, for the jury found the second issue against the plaintiff, and there are no assignments of error as to the charge upon that issue.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyatt v. City of Raleigh, 90 S.E. 213, 172 N.C. 847, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 423 (N.C. 1916).

90 S.E. 213 (Wyatt v. City of Raleigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Call v. Stroud
61 S.E.2d 342 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)