Wyatt v. BLAIR PACKAGING

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wyatt v. BLAIR PACKAGING

295 S.W.3d 229, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1462, 2009 WL 3364266

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 2009·No. ED 92756·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Wyatt (Claimant) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of the administrative law judge and finding that Claimant was not permanently totally disabled. We affirm the award of the Commission.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission’s award is supported by sufficient and competent evidence in the record as a whole. Rule 84.16(b)(4). No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Wyatt (Claimant) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of the administrative law judge and finding that Claimant was not permanently totally disabled. We affirm the award of the Commission.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission’s award is supported by sufficient and competent evidence in the record as a whole. Rule 84.16(b)(4). No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

Wyatt v. BLAIR PACKAGING, 295 S.W.3d 229, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1462, 2009 WL 3364266 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 229 (Wyatt v. BLAIR PACKAGING) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related