Wyatt v. Bernhoester

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wyatt v. Bernhoester

585 S.W.2d 130, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2421

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 19, 1979

DocketNo. 40478

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 585 S.W.2d 130 (Wyatt v. Bernhoester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyatt v. Bernhoester, 585 S.W.2d 130, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2421 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

CRIST, Judge.

Case on abrogation of interspousal and parental immunities in tort.

Plaintiffs, wife and two minor children, filed suit against wife’s husband and minors’ father, alleging that husband-father was jointly negligent with another defendant in causing injuries’ to plaintiffs by reason of an automobile collision. The petition alleged that none of the claims exceeded the amount of insurance coverage available to the husband-father.

[131]*131Husband-father filed a motion for summary judgment claiming the doctrines of interspousal immunity and parental immunity barred the plaintiffs’ cause of action. Plaintiffs and defendant-husband stipulated that: (1) Plaintiff-wife and defendant-husband were married to each other at the time of the accident and continuously thereafter; (2) Plaintiff-wife and defendant-husband were the parents of the unemanci-pated minor plaintiffs Weslie, Jr. and Tammy; and (3) all plaintiffs and defendant-husband lived together as a family.

The trial court granted summary judgment to the husband-father. We find no error.

May a spouse maintain an action against his or her spouse for a personal tort which occurred during coverture? Our Supreme Court has answered this question in the negative. Ebel v. Ferguson, 478 S.W.2d 334, 336 (Mo. banc 1972); Deatherage v. Deatherage, 328 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Mo.1959); Brawner v. Brawner, 327 S.W.2d 808, 814 (Mo. banc 1959); Willott v. Willott, 333 Mo. 896, 900, 62 S.W.2d 1084, 1086 (1933); and Rogers v. Rogers, 265 Mo. 200, 208, 177 S.W. 382, 384 (1915).

May an unemancipated minor child maintain an action for personal tort, involving only negligence, against a parent with whom such child is living? Our Supreme Court has also answered this question in the negative. Bahr v. Bahr, 478 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Mo.1972); Brennecke v. Kilpatrick, 336 S.W.2d 68, 70 (Mo. banc 1960); and Baker v. Baker, 364 Mo. 453, 458, 263.S.W.2d 29, 32 (1953).

We are bound by Article V, Section 2 of the 1945 Missouri Constitution to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of Missouri.

Judgment affirmed.

REINHARD, P. J., and GUNN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRIST, Judge.

Case on abrogation of interspousal and parental immunities in tort.

Plaintiffs, wife and two minor children, filed suit against wife’s husband and minors’ father, alleging that husband-father was jointly negligent with another defendant in causing injuries’ to plaintiffs by reason of an automobile collision. The petition alleged that none of the claims exceeded the amount of insurance coverage available to the husband-father.

[131]*131Husband-father filed a motion for summary judgment claiming the doctrines of interspousal immunity and parental immunity barred the plaintiffs’ cause of action. Plaintiffs and defendant-husband stipulated that: (1) Plaintiff-wife and defendant-husband were married to each other at the time of the accident and continuously thereafter; (2) Plaintiff-wife and defendant-husband were the parents of the unemanci-pated minor plaintiffs Weslie, Jr. and Tammy; and (3) all plaintiffs and defendant-husband lived together as a family.

The trial court granted summary judgment to the husband-father. We find no error.

May a spouse maintain an action against his or her spouse for a personal tort which occurred during coverture? Our Supreme Court has answered this question in the negative. Ebel v. Ferguson, 478 S.W.2d 334, 336 (Mo. banc 1972); Deatherage v. Deatherage, 328 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Mo.1959); Brawner v. Brawner, 327 S.W.2d 808, 814 (Mo. banc 1959); Willott v. Willott, 333 Mo. 896, 900, 62 S.W.2d 1084, 1086 (1933); and Rogers v. Rogers, 265 Mo. 200, 208, 177 S.W. 382, 384 (1915).

May an unemancipated minor child maintain an action for personal tort, involving only negligence, against a parent with whom such child is living? Our Supreme Court has also answered this question in the negative. Bahr v. Bahr, 478 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Mo.1972); Brennecke v. Kilpatrick, 336 S.W.2d 68, 70 (Mo. banc 1960); and Baker v. Baker, 364 Mo. 453, 458, 263.S.W.2d 29, 32 (1953).

We are bound by Article V, Section 2 of the 1945 Missouri Constitution to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of Missouri.

Judgment affirmed.

REINHARD, P. J., and GUNN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 S.W.2d 130, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-bernhoester-moctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack