Wyatt, Graylon

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 20, 2008
DocketWR-70,053-01
StatusPublished

This text of Wyatt, Graylon (Wyatt, Graylon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyatt, Graylon, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-70,053-01
EX PARTE GRAYLON WYATT, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 91F0298-202-A IN THE 202ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM BOWIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of forgery and sentenced to ten (10) years' imprisonment.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that he has been confined since his arrest on a pre-revocation warrant on June 3, 2007, but he never received a revocation hearing and "to his knowledge" he did not waive a revocation hearing.

Applicant has alleged facts which if true may entitle him to relief. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 485 (1972). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In addition, the trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit explaining whether Applicant received a release revocation hearing and, if not, the reasons for failing to give Applicant such a hearing.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant received a release revocation hearing and, if not, why he has not been given such a hearing. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 45 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 60 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 20, 2008

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wyatt, Graylon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-graylon-texcrimapp-2008.