Wyant v. Battista
448 So. 2d 1122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980); Clayton v. Clayton, 442 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). It is not necessary for the court to rule on appellee’s motion for extension of time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wyant v. Battista, 448 So. 2d 1122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
448 So. 2d 1122 (Wyant v. Battista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Industrial Fire & Cas. Co. v. Acquesta
448 So. 2d 1122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)