Wyandotte Electric Supply v. Electrical Technology Systems Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Wyandotte Electric Supply v. Electrical Technology Systems Inc

DecidedFebruary 4, 2015

Docket149989

StatusPublished

This text of Wyandotte Electric Supply v. Electrical Technology Systems Inc (Wyandotte Electric Supply v. Electrical Technology Systems Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyandotte Electric Supply v. Electrical Technology Systems Inc, (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 4, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

149989 Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano WYANDOTTE ELECTRIC SUPPLY, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 149989 COA: 313736 Wayne CC: 11-003015-CK ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and KEO & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff- Appellant, and WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff served on the principal contractor the 30-day notice within the meaning of MCL 129.207; (2) whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages, if any, that include a time-price differential and attorney fees; and (3) whether MCL 600.6013(7) is applicable to the judgment in this case.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 4, 2015 p0128 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 4, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

149989 Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano WYANDOTTE ELECTRIC SUPPLY, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 149989 COA: 313736 Wayne CC: 11-003015-CK ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and KEO & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff- Appellant, and WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff served on the principal contractor the 30-day notice within the meaning of MCL 129.207; (2) whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages, if any, that include a time-price differential and attorney fees; and (3) whether MCL 600.6013(7) is applicable to the judgment in this case.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 4, 2015 p0128 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wyandotte Electric Supply v. Electrical Technology Systems Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyandotte-electric-supply-v-electrical-technology--mich-2015.