WW v. DS

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in WW v. DS. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Haw. 123
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 2, 2020·No. SCWC-18-0000361·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

02-MAR-2020

10:20 AM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

WW, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs.

DS, and CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondents/Respondents-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; FC-P NO. 16-1-0149)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant WW’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 22, 2020, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case, subject to further order of the court. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 2, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WW v. DS, (haw 2020).

WW v. DS (WW v. DS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.