Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co. v. United States

2023 CIT 02

Opinion

Slip Op. 23-

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

WUXI TIANRAN PHOTOVOLTAIC CO., LTD., Plaintiff,

and

JA SOLAR TECH. YANGZHOU CO., LTD., SHANGHAI JA SOLAR TECH. CO., LTD., and JINGAO SOLAR CO., LTD.,

Consolidated Plaintiffs, Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge

v. Consol. Ct. No. 21-00538 UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

Following remand, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) submitted

the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 38 (Oct. 6, 2022)

(“Remand Results”). Plaintiff Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd., submitted comments on the

Remand Results arguing that Commerce’s general practice of requiring “complete participation in

verification” for all of a respondent’s customers is unreasonable. Comments on Remand

Redetermination of Plaintiff, ECF No. 41 at 2–3 (Nov. 7, 2022) (“Tianran Comments”).

Nevertheless, in this unique circumstance, Plaintiff concedes that the Remand Results comply with

the court’s remand order and does not further challenge Commerce’s determination. Tianran

Comments at 2–3 (“Tianran concedes that Commerce’s Remand Results generally complies with

the [c]ourt’s Remand Order . . . . Tianran does not further challenge Commerce’s determination

in the Remand Results”). Consolidated Plaintiffs do not raise any independent comments. See Objections to Remand Results of Consolidated Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Intervenors, ECF. No. 42

(Nov. 7, 2022). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Remand Results by Commerce are

SUSTAINED.

/s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani, Judge

Dated: January 10, 2023 New York, New York