Wusyk v. Wusyk
180 A. 875, 119 N.J. Eq. 229, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 611
Opinion
Our examination of the proofs presented in this ease convinces us that the decree entered in the court below was justified, and it is, therefore, affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 15.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wusyk v. Wusyk, 180 A. 875, 119 N.J. Eq. 229, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 611 (N.J. 1935).
180 A. 875 (Wusyk v. Wusyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.