Wusyk v. Wusyk

180 A. 875, 119 N.J. Eq. 229, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 611
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 9, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 180 A. 875 (Wusyk v. Wusyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wusyk v. Wusyk, 180 A. 875, 119 N.J. Eq. 229, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 611 (N.J. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the proofs presented in this ease convinces us that the decree entered in the court below was justified, and it is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 15.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 A. 875, 119 N.J. Eq. 229, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wusyk-v-wusyk-nj-1935.