Wurst v. Branin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Wurst v. Branin

141 A. 922, 102 N.J. Eq. 326

DecidedFebruary 6, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A. 922 (Wurst v. Branin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wurst v. Branin, 141 A. 922, 102 N.J. Eq. 326 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Our examination of the decree below, and of the evidence upon which it is based, results in the conclusion that the decree is right.

The evidence required the application of the rule as to independent advice as laid down in Slack v. Rees, 66 N.J. Eq. 447, and Post v. Hagan, 71 N.J. Eq. 234. The vice-chancellor correctly applied the rule. The decree below will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 327

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Our examination of the decree below, and of the evidence upon which it is based, results in the conclusion that the decree is right.

The evidence required the application of the rule as to independent advice as laid down in Slack v. Rees, 66 N.J. Eq. 447, and Post v. Hagan, 71 N.J. Eq. 234. The vice-chancellor correctly applied the rule. The decree below will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 327

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A. 922, 102 N.J. Eq. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wurst-v-branin-nj-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack