Wuppermann v. Valentine

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Wuppermann v. Valentine

84 N.Y.S. 150

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 150 (Wuppermann v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wuppermann v. Valentine, 84 N.Y.S. 150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant made a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. The motion was granted, unless plaintiff placed the cause on the calendar within three days from the entry of the order. The defendant entered an order on said motion, and then appealed from each and every part of said order. We are not satisfied that there has been such an abuse of discretion on the part of the court below, in giving plaintiff the opportunity of placing the cause on the calendar, as to call for a reversal.

The order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant made a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. The motion was granted, unless plaintiff placed the cause on the calendar within three days from the entry of the order. The defendant entered an order on said motion, and then appealed from each and every part of said order. We are not satisfied that there has been such an abuse of discretion on the part of the court below, in giving plaintiff the opportunity of placing the cause on the calendar, as to call for a reversal.

The order is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wuppermann-v-valentine-nyappterm-1903.