Wunderlich v. Southern Const. Co.

174 So. 318, 234 Ala. 178, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 202
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 13, 1937
Docket6 Div. 135.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 174 So. 318 (Wunderlich v. Southern Const. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wunderlich v. Southern Const. Co., 174 So. 318, 234 Ala. 178, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 202 (Ala. 1937).

Opinion

KNIGHT, Justice.

This cause comes before us on petition of Martin Wunderlich for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals, to review and revise the opinion and judgment of that court in the case of Martin Wunderlich v. Southern Construction Company, Inc., 27 Ala.App. 458, 174 So. 317.

We have uniformly held that we would not review the evidence, as contained in the record, to determine for ourselves what the facts of the case really were, but would accept and act upon the finding of the facts as made by the Court of Appeals.

The Court of Appeals has properly applied the law of the case to the facts as found by them, and we must, therefore, deny the writ prayed for.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flannagin v. State
266 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Ex Parte Thaggard
159 So. 2d 820 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 318, 234 Ala. 178, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wunderlich-v-southern-const-co-ala-1937.