Wunderlich v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

66 N.W. 1144, 93 Wis. 132, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 16
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedApril 14, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 66 N.W. 1144 (Wunderlich v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wunderlich v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co., 66 N.W. 1144, 93 Wis. 132, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 16 (Wis. 1896).

Opinion

Winslow, J".

Fairly and reasonably construed, the complaint charges that the property of the plaintiffs Wunderlich was destroyed by a fire negligently kindled by the defendant, and that the plaintiff insurance companies had previously issued to the plaintiffs Wunderlich contracts of insurance against fire upon said property, which were in force at the time of the fire, and that said insurance companies had paid the losses under their policies. The demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled, for two reasons: (1) Because it is settled in this state that “ the question of misjoinder of plaintiffs, or whether the complaint, as to one or more of several plaintiffs, states a cause of action against the defendants, cannot be raised by demurrer under any of the grounds allowed by sec. 2649, R. S.” Kucera v. Kucera, 86 Wis. 416. (2) Because it is equally well settled that where insured property is destroyed by fire through the negligence of another, the insurer of such property, who has paid the insured the insurance moneys, becomes subrogated pro tanto to the latter’s claim against the wrongdoer, and should properly join with him as plaintiff in an action for such negligent burning. Pratt v. Radford, 52 Wis. 114.

By the Gourt.— Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patitucci v. Gerhardt
240 N.W. 385 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1932)
Woelfel v. New England Mutual Life Insurance
195 N.W. 871 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)
State ex rel. Kratche v. Civil Court of Milwaukee County
191 N.W. 507 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)
Mayhall & Neible v. Chicago, Burlinton & Quincy Railroad
185 N.W. 326 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1921)
Palmer v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.
208 F. 666 (W.D. Washington, 1913)
Gaugler v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.
197 F. 79 (D. Montana, 1912)
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.
108 P. 770 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Gatzweiler v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
116 N.W. 633 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Sims v. Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of La Prairie
77 N.W. 908 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.W. 1144, 93 Wis. 132, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wunderlich-v-chicago-northwestern-railway-co-wis-1896.