Wummer v. Lowary

441 So. 2d 1151, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24103
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1983·No. No. 83-125·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal was taken from the trial court’s order granting Lowary’s and denying Wummer’s summary judgment motion. We reverse.

Wummer refinanced one of her employee’s repossessed Camaro. She deducted the monthly payments from the employee’s paycheck and the employee maintained control over the car. Lowary was injured while a passenger in the Camaro. Suit was filed against Wummer as the owner of the vehicle.

Beneficial ownership carries with it liability for damages which arise from an automobile’s negligent operation. Harrell v. Sellars, 424 So.2d 881 (Fla. 1st DCA [1152]*11521983); Hicks v. Land, 117 So.2d 11 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960); and, Cox Motor Co. v. Faber, 113 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). Wum-mer’s employee had sole possession of the auto. Wummer saw it for the first time after the accident occurred. She was not the beneficial owner of the Camaro. Accordingly, we reverse the order granting Lowary’s and denying Wummer⅛ motion for summary judgment.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wummer v. Lowary, 441 So. 2d 1151, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24103 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

441 So. 2d 1151 (Wummer v. Lowary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert L. Christensen v. Mary Jo Bowen
140 So. 3d 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Bowen v. Taylor-Christensen
98 So. 3d 136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Carrasquero v. Ethan's Auto Express, Inc.
949 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Palm Beach Auto Brokers, Inc. v. DeCarlo
620 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Johnson v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co.
472 So. 2d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)