Wulff v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wulff v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

181 A.D. 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D. 922 (Wulff v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wulff v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 181 A.D. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is modified by imposing the following terms as conditions for the granting of the resettlement of the order desired: (1) That plaintiff be allowed to discontinue her appeal from the original order without costs; (2) that plaintiff be allowed to withdraw the papers heretofore filed on said appeal and that defendant return such papers therein as may have been served on it, and (3) that defendant pay for the printing of plaintiff’s brief on the appeal from the original order, and of the resettled order upon a new appeal; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Shearn, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is modified by imposing the following terms as conditions for the granting of the resettlement of the order desired: (1) That plaintiff be allowed to discontinue her appeal from the original order without costs; (2) that plaintiff be allowed to withdraw the papers heretofore filed on said appeal and that defendant return such papers therein as may have been served on it, and (3) that defendant pay for the printing of plaintiff’s brief on the appeal from the original order, and of the resettled order upon a new appeal; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Shearn, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D. 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wulff-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappdiv-1917.