Wu v. Leonard
This text of Wu v. Leonard (Wu v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 01-JUL-2025 08:02 AM Dkt. 12 ORD
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
DI WU, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE KATHERINE G. LEONARD, Acting Chief Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge
and
DAN DAN ZHANG aka DANDAN ZHANG, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus
filed May 19, 2025, and the record, Petitioner has not
demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a
lack of alternative means to seek the relief sought in this
original proceeding. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537
P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
Construed as an application for writ of certiorari, the
application is rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 1, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wu v. Leonard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wu-v-leonard-haw-2025.