Wu v. Leonard
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
01-JUL-2025
08:02 AM
Dkt. 12 ORD
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
DI WU,
Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE KATHERINE G. LEONARD, Acting Chief Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge
and
DAN DAN ZHANG aka DANDAN ZHANG, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed May 19, 2025, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to seek the relief sought in this original proceeding. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
Construed as an application for writ of certiorari, the application is rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 1, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wu v. Leonard (Wu v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.