Wu v. Leonard

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 2025·No. SCPW-25-0000410·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

01-JUL-2025

08:02 AM

Dkt. 12 ORD

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

DI WU,

Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE KATHERINE G. LEONARD, Acting Chief Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge

and

DAN DAN ZHANG aka DANDAN ZHANG, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed May 19, 2025, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to seek the relief sought in this original proceeding. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See

Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

Construed as an application for writ of certiorari, the application is rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 1, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wu v. Leonard, (haw 2025).

Wu v. Leonard (Wu v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Womble Bond Dickinson v. Kim
537 P.3d 1154 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2023)