W.T. v. K.F.Y.

59 So. 3d 1216, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6425, 2011 WL 1705593
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 2011
DocketNo. 5D10-4031
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 So. 3d 1216 (W.T. v. K.F.Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W.T. v. K.F.Y., 59 So. 3d 1216, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6425, 2011 WL 1705593 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court terminated W.T.’s parental rights and granted Appellees’ petition for stepparent adoption after a hearing. W.T. appeals the order terminating his parental rights because he is indigent and incarcerated and was unrepresented below. We agree that reversal is appropriate.

[1217]*1217Despite receiving notice of the hearing and arranging to appear telephonically, the Department of Corrections inadvertently caused Appellant to miss the hearing, which proceeded in his absence. Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.525(d) provides that “all parties have the right to be present at all termination hearings.” In a similar context, this court has held that a default consent termination should not be entered when the parent’s failure to appear is due to forces beyond his control. See A.H. v. Dep’t. of Children and Families, 22 So.3d 801 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). We believe the same result should apply in this case.

Further, there is neither a transcript, nor an adequate substitute, memorializing the proceedings before the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(g). See J.D.L. v. W.J.J., Jr., 54 So.3d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand to the trial court to conduct a new hearing with the Appellant present, if he elects to exercise that right. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(b).1

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

TORPY, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J.C. v. Catholic Charities of Central Florida
98 So. 3d 260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 So. 3d 1216, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6425, 2011 WL 1705593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wt-v-kfy-fladistctapp-2011.