Wsou Investments LLC v. F5, Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: February 28, 2025
• Docket: 23-1427
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-1427 Document: 67 Page: 1 Filed: 02/28/2025

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC, DBA BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

F5, INC., FKA F5 NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2023-1427 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:21-cv-00126-BJR, Senior Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein. ______________________

SUA SPONTE ______________________

PER CURIAM. ORDER On February 21, 2025, we entered an Order directing the parties to address whether there is no appealable judg- ment in this case in light of F5’s assertion of invalidity counterclaims. ECF No. 64. The parties have responded, agreeing that at present there is no appealable judgment and reporting that they have jointly requested that the dis- trict court dismiss the invalidity counterclaims without prejudice. ECF No. 66. Case: 23-1427 Document: 67 Page: 2 Filed: 02/28/2025

2 WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC v. F5, INC.

Having considered the parties’ joint response, we deem the most appropriate course to be to dismiss the appeal so that the district court may act on the parties’ joint request to enter an order that dismisses outstanding counterclaims without prejudice to the counterclaims being reinstated if the judgment dated and entered December 13, 2022 (Dis- trict Court Docket No. 217) is disturbed on appeal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, but this court will reinstate the appeal under the same docket number without the payment of an additional filing fee if, no later than 3 p.m. eastern time, March 4, 2025, WSOU Investments LLC has filed a notice of appeal from the entry of an appealable order entered by the district court and so notified this court. (2) If the appeal is reinstated, the oral argument sched- uled for March 5, 2025, will go forward, and the case will be decided by this court based on that oral argument and the briefs already filed. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs. (4) The mandate shall issue forthwith.

FOR THE COURT

February 28, 2025 Date