Wrublewsky v. Tidewater Building Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wrublewsky v. Tidewater Building Co.

158 A.D. 908, 142 N.Y.S. 1151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A.D. 908 (Wrublewsky v. Tidewater Building Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wrublewsky v. Tidewater Building Co., 158 A.D. 908, 142 N.Y.S. 1151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The evidence fails to establish how plaintiff’s intestate came to enter the bin in which he met his death. There is no evidence of any instructions from any one that he should do so, and the circumstantial evidence would indicate that it was unnecessary for him to do so in the ordinary discharge of his duties. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The evidence fails to establish how plaintiff’s intestate came to enter the bin in which he met his death. There is no evidence of any instructions from any one that he should do so, and the circumstantial evidence would indicate that it was unnecessary for him to do so in the ordinary discharge of his duties. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A.D. 908, 142 N.Y.S. 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wrublewsky-v-tidewater-building-co-nyappdiv-1913.