Wrobleski v. Wrobleski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wrobleski v. Wrobleski

458 So. 2d 412, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2334, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15760

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1984

DocketNo. 84-1087

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 412 (Wrobleski v. Wrobleski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wrobleski v. Wrobleski, 458 So. 2d 412, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2334, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for writ of common law certiorari addressed to the trial court’s order which denied the defendant’s motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s attorney, Calvin Brown, and his law firm, Collins, Brown, Caldwell & Carter. We have jurisdiction to consider the petition pursuant to Article V, Section 4(b)(3), Florida Constitution. The trial court refused to rule on the merits of the motion. We hold that the refusal to consider the merits of that motion is a departure from the essential requirements of the law. Pantori, Inc. v. Stephenson, 384 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Accordingly, certiorari is granted, the order quashed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

LETTS, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for writ of common law certiorari addressed to the trial court’s order which denied the defendant’s motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s attorney, Calvin Brown, and his law firm, Collins, Brown, Caldwell & Carter. We have jurisdiction to consider the petition pursuant to Article V, Section 4(b)(3), Florida Constitution. The trial court refused to rule on the merits of the motion. We hold that the refusal to consider the merits of that motion is a departure from the essential requirements of the law. Pantori, Inc. v. Stephenson, 384 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Accordingly, certiorari is granted, the order quashed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

LETTS, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 So. 2d 412, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2334, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wrobleski-v-wrobleski-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack