Wrinkle v. Cooper
This text of 859 So. 2d 629 (Wrinkle v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of September 2, 2003, and September 30, 2003, the Court has determined that because the appellant was never made a party to the proceedings below, the appellant does not have standing to maintain the appeal. See Forcum v. Symmes, 101 Fla. 1266, 133 So. 88 (1931)(holding that it is a fundamental principle of appellate law that appeal jurisdiction is only available to parties); see also Stas v. Posada, 760 So.2d 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is [630]*630hereby dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
859 So. 2d 629, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18072, 2003 WL 22799567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wrinkle-v-cooper-fladistctapp-2003.