Wright's Executars v. Wright's Heirs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Wright's Executars v. Wright's Heirs

1 N.C. 363

DecidedJanuary 15, 1814

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 363 (Wright's Executars v. Wright's Heirs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright's Executars v. Wright's Heirs, 1 N.C. 363 (N.C. 1814).

Pincite

Opinion

Seawell, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a new trial granted in the Court below, and is submitted to this Court without any statement. There is an affidavit which accompanies the record, by which it appeals probable the party who prevailed on the issue, tam[364]*364pered with the Jury. Whenever an appeal is made without presenting any point for the decision of this Court, there would then be no ground for disturbing the decision below. If the affidavit was the ground of the new trial, we should think that the matter set forth was a sufficient cause for it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seawell, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a new trial granted in the Court below, and is submitted to this Court without any statement. There is an affidavit which accompanies the record, by which it appeals probable the party who prevailed on the issue, tam[364]*364pered with the Jury. Whenever an appeal is made without presenting any point for the decision of this Court, there would then be no ground for disturbing the decision below. If the affidavit was the ground of the new trial, we should think that the matter set forth was a sufficient cause for it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wrights-executars-v-wrights-heirs-nc-1814.