Wrighten v. Office of Personnel Management
This text of 49 F. App'x 296 (Wrighten v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[297]*297ORDER
Hazel E. Wrighten responds to the court’s order directing her to show cause why her petition for review should not be dismissed. The Office of Personnel Management also responds.
On October 5, 2001, Wrighten sought review of two initial decisions issued by two separate Administrative Judges (AJs) on June 30, 2000 and March 6, 2001, respectively. Those decisions were not final decisions and were subsequently vacated by the Merit Systems Protection Board. Additionally, Wrighten’s petition for review was not filed within 60 days of either decision and, thus, must be dismissed on that ground. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Wrighten’s petition is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
We note that the board has now issued a final decision and that Wrighten has filed a timely petition for review of that decision, 02-3195.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 F. App'x 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wrighten-v-office-of-personnel-management-cafc-2002.