Wright-Ziegler Co. v. Boylan

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Wright-Ziegler Co. v. Boylan

5 R.I. Dec. 82

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 7, 1929·No. No. 70417·Published

Opinion

HAHN, J.

Heard upon plaintiff’s motion for a new trial based upon the usual grounds.

This action arose from the sale of a milking machine which defendant claimed was not according to representations made at the time of sale, and the further fact that it did not do the work satisfactorily.

The questions involved were largely questions of fact and the verdict was not against the law, the evidence or the weight thereof.

Motion for new trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAHN, J.

Heard upon plaintiff’s motion for a new trial based upon the usual grounds.

This action arose from the sale of a milking machine which defendant claimed was not according to representations made at the time of sale, and the further fact that it did not do the work satisfactorily.

The questions involved were largely questions of fact and the verdict was not against the law, the evidence or the weight thereof.

Motion for new trial denied.

Wright-Ziegler Co. v. Boylan, 5 R.I. Dec. 82 (R.I. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

5 R.I. Dec. 82 (Wright-Ziegler Co. v. Boylan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.