Wright v. Zurinsky

D.C. Circuit

Wright v. Zurinsky

111 F. App'x 615

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 1, 2004

DocketNo. 04-7014

StatusPublished

This text of 111 F. App'x 615 (Wright v. Zurinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Zurinsky, 111 F. App'x 615 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

[616]*616 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by. appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s dismissal order filed January 23, 2004 be affirmed. Appellant’s complaint does not allege a federal question and, while diversity may exist, appellant has not demonstrated that venue lies in this district. See Buchanan v. Manley, 145 F.3d 386 (D.C.Cir.1998) (per curiam); 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[616]*616 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by. appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s dismissal order filed January 23, 2004 be affirmed. Appellant’s complaint does not allege a federal question and, while diversity may exist, appellant has not demonstrated that venue lies in this district. See Buchanan v. Manley, 145 F.3d 386 (D.C.Cir.1998) (per curiam); 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F. App'x 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-zurinsky-cadc-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack