Wright v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Wright v. Wright

1942 OK 347, 129 P.2d 1007, 191 Okla. 356, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 212

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 13, 1942·No. No. 30658.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 10th day of June, 1941, the trial court entered an order extending the time in which to make and serve a case-made. This order expired on June 30, 1941, and no valid order of extension was made thereafter. The case-made was served on July 21, 1941. The appeal is dismissed under the rule announced in Jones v. Blanton, 130 Okla. 200, 266 P. 438, and Whitten v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass’n of Missouri, 184 Okla. 132, 85 P. 2d 759, for failure to make and serve a case-made within the time allowed by the order of the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAY-LESS, GIBSON, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. WELCH, C. J., and RILEY and DAVISON, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 10th day of June, 1941, the trial court entered an order extending the time in which to make and serve a case-made. This order expired on June 30, 1941, and no valid order of extension was made thereafter. The case-made was served on July 21, 1941. The appeal is dismissed under the rule announced in Jones v. Blanton, 130 Okla. 200, 266 P. 438, and Whitten v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass’n of Missouri, 184 Okla. 132, 85 P. 2d 759, for failure to make and serve a case-made within the time allowed by the order of the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAY-LESS, GIBSON, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. WELCH, C. J., and RILEY and DAVISON, JJ., absent.

Wright v. Wright, 1942 OK 347, 129 P.2d 1007, 191 Okla. 356, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 212 (Okla. 1942).

Pincite

1942 OK 347 (Wright v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related