Wright v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Wright v. Wright

110 A. 926, 134 Md. 659, 1919 Md. LEXIS 111

DecidedApril 11, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 110 A. 926 (Wright v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Wright, 110 A. 926, 134 Md. 659, 1919 Md. LEXIS 111 (Md. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

*660 By the Court:

The decree of the Circuit Court for Caroline County, dated the 9th day of May, 1918, and appealed from, in this ease, was affirmed on appeal to this Court by a per curiam, filed herein on the 6th of March, 1919.

The reasons for the conclusion we reached in that case and the principles of law upon which it rests, will be found fully stated and announced in the case of Key et als. v. Key, filed in this Court on the 9th day of April, 1919.

For the reasons stated in the Key case, the decree in this case was heretofore affirmed by the per curiam filed herein, and we do not deem it necessary to restate them in this case.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*660 By the Court:

The decree of the Circuit Court for Caroline County, dated the 9th day of May, 1918, and appealed from, in this ease, was affirmed on appeal to this Court by a per curiam, filed herein on the 6th of March, 1919.

The reasons for the conclusion we reached in that case and the principles of law upon which it rests, will be found fully stated and announced in the case of Key et als. v. Key, filed in this Court on the 9th day of April, 1919.

For the reasons stated in the Key case, the decree in this case was heretofore affirmed by the per curiam filed herein, and we do not deem it necessary to restate them in this case.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A. 926, 134 Md. 659, 1919 Md. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-wright-md-1919.