Wright v. Wright

30 Ill. App. 349, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 295
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 13, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 Ill. App. 349 (Wright v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Wright, 30 Ill. App. 349, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 295 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Opinion

Garnett, P. J.

The only question in this case is disposed of hy the ruling in Wharton v. Wright [ante p. 343], Appellant in this declaration charges appellees with libel, and appellees defend on the ground that the communication was privileged. There was evidence tending to prove that the alleged privilege was used to gratify a malicious spirit, and appellant had the right to have the case submitted to the jury.

Repetition of what is said in Wharton v. Wright is unnecessary. The court erred in directing the jury to find the defendants not guilty. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Judge v. Rockford Memorial Hospital
150 N.E.2d 202 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Ill. App. 349, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-wright-illappct-1889.