Wright v. Wright

228 S.E.2d 9, 139 Ga. App. 60, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1678
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 25, 1976
Docket52209
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 228 S.E.2d 9 (Wright v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Wright, 228 S.E.2d 9, 139 Ga. App. 60, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1678 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

In this garnishment case the trial court set aside a judgment against the garnishee but did not terminate the garnishment proceeding. This order is not a final judgment. Finch v. Kilgore, 120 Ga. App. 320 (170 SE2d 304). There is no certificate of immediate review nor has this court granted an application for an appeal under Code Ann. § 6-701 (a). The appeal is premature and must be dismissed. Nash v. Carlile, 138 Ga. App. 906. On remand see Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729; Battles v. Battles, 138 Ga. App. 841.

Appeal dismissed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trust Co. v. Ferrior
233 S.E.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Davis v. Davis
229 S.E.2d 81 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 S.E.2d 9, 139 Ga. App. 60, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-wright-gactapp-1976.