Wright v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wright v. Wright

249 So. 2d 456, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6359

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 1971·No. No. O-328·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Rieder v. Rieder, 157 So.2d 93 (Fla.App.1963), and Ludacer v. Ludacer, 211 So.2d 64 (Fla.App.1968).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Rieder v. Rieder, 157 So.2d 93 (Fla.App.1963), and Ludacer v. Ludacer, 211 So.2d 64 (Fla.App.1968).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Wright v. Wright, 249 So. 2d 456, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

249 So. 2d 456 (Wright v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related