Wright v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wright v. Wright

249 So. 2d 456, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6359

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1971

DocketNo. O-328

StatusPublished

This text of 249 So. 2d 456 (Wright v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Wright, 249 So. 2d 456, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Rieder v. Rieder, 157 So.2d 93 (Fla.App.1963), and Ludacer v. Ludacer, 211 So.2d 64 (Fla.App.1968).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Rieder v. Rieder, 157 So.2d 93 (Fla.App.1963), and Ludacer v. Ludacer, 211 So.2d 64 (Fla.App.1968).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 So. 2d 456, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-wright-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack