Wright v. Wilmot

22 Tex. 398
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Bell, J.

Tbe plaintiffs in error were defendants in tbe court below. Tbe writ to defendant, Wrigbt, purports to bave been issued on tbe 4tb of December, 1858. Tbe writ to Leonard, was issued on tbe 4tb of January, 1858. The writs cite tbe defendants to appear “ on tbe 16th Monday, after the 4th Monday in September, 1858.” Tbe judgment was rendered, by default, on tbe 25th day of January, 1858.

Tbe service is not sufficient to support tbe judgment. Tbe writs were defective, and ought to bave been quashed, and other citations properly served on tbe defendants. Tbe courts cannot supply, by construction or intendment, tbe want of proper certainty in a writ, in point of time. Tbe judgment is reversed, and tbe cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Wilmot, 22 Tex. 398 (Tex. 1858).

22 Tex. 398 (Wright v. Wilmot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyner v. Glass
27 S.W.2d 916 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Taylor v. Taylor
157 S.W. 1184 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Caspary v. Greely-Burnham Grocer Co.
3 Willson 219 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)
Leal v. Woodhouse
2 Wilson 82 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1884)
McNeil v. Ballinger & Mott
1 White & W. 482 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Hunt v. Schrieb
37 Tex. 632 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)