Wright v. Wilmot

22 Tex. 398
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 22 Tex. 398 (Wright v. Wilmot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Wilmot, 22 Tex. 398 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Bell, J.

Tbe plaintiffs in error were defendants in tbe court below. Tbe writ to defendant, Wrigbt, purports to bave been issued on tbe 4tb of December, 1858. Tbe writ to Leonard, was issued on tbe 4tb of January, 1858. The writs cite tbe defendants to appear “ on tbe 16th Monday, after the 4th Monday in September, 1858.” Tbe judgment was rendered, by default, on tbe 25th day of January, 1858.

Tbe service is not sufficient to support tbe judgment. Tbe writs were defective, and ought to bave been quashed, and other citations properly served on tbe defendants. Tbe courts cannot supply, by construction or intendment, tbe want of proper certainty in a writ, in point of time. Tbe judgment is reversed, and tbe cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyner v. Glass
27 S.W.2d 916 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Taylor v. Taylor
157 S.W. 1184 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Caspary v. Greely-Burnham Grocer Co.
3 Willson 219 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)
Leal v. Woodhouse
2 Wilson 82 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1884)
McNeil v. Ballinger & Mott
1 White & W. 482 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Hunt v. Schrieb
37 Tex. 632 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Tex. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-wilmot-tex-1858.