Wright v. Williamson

Fourth Circuit

Wright v. Williamson

87 F. App'x 897

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2004·No. No. 03-7569·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Wright, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition challenging the legality of his conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Williamson, No. CA-02-1401-5 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Wright, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition challenging the legality of his conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Williamson, No. CA-02-1401-5 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Wright v. Williamson, 87 F. App'x 897 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

87 F. App'x 897 (Wright v. Williamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related