Wright v. Whittenhal

Supreme Court of Missouri

Wright v. Whittenhal

39 Mo. 355

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1866·Published

Opinion

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the appellants failed to file a transcript in this court within the time prescribed by law. The respondents now ask leave to file a transcript, and move for an affirmance of the judgment. No sufficient reason appearing for the failure of the appellants to file a transcript in time, the judgment will be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the appellants failed to file a transcript in this court within the time prescribed by law. The respondents now ask leave to file a transcript, and move for an affirmance of the judgment. No sufficient reason appearing for the failure of the appellants to file a transcript in time, the judgment will be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Wright v. Whittenhal, 39 Mo. 355 (Mo. 1866).

Pincite

39 Mo. 355 (Wright v. Whittenhal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.