Wright v. Walton

25 Va. Cir. 263, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 279
CourtAlexandria County Circuit Court
DecidedOctober 4, 1991
DocketCase No. CL910256
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Va. Cir. 263 (Wright v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alexandria County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Walton, 25 Va. Cir. 263, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 279 (Va. Super. Ct. 1991).

Opinion

By JUDGE ALFRED D. SWERSKY

Defendants' motion to transfer venue will be granted.

Plaintiff asserts that venue is proper under Section 8.01-262(3) and has shown that defendant "regularly and systematically conducts affairs or business activity" in Alexandria. However, this Code section establishes "a logical forum when considered in the context of fairness and convenience." See Reviser’s Note § 8.01-262.

No unfairness or inconvenience results to plaintiff if this case is transferred to Fairfax where the defendants’ office is located and where the incidents giving rise to plaintiff’s claim occurred. The Court finds, pursuant to § 8.01-265, that Fairfax is a fair and convenient forum for this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Va. Cir. 263, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-walton-vaccalexandria-1991.