Wright v. Walker

81 So. 689, 17 Ala. App. 57, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 79
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 13, 1919
Docket7 Div. 580.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 81 So. 689 (Wright v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Walker, 81 So. 689, 17 Ala. App. 57, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 79 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The. oral charge of the court is not set out in the record, nor is there a bill of exceptions. The only assigns ments of error are based upon the refusal of the court to give certain written charges. Where this is the case, under the universal rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, beginning with the Acts of the Legislature of 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 815) as construed in the case of Mitchell v. State, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 South. 982, and in all subsequent eases bearing upon this subject, collated in Shepard’s Alabama Citations, vol. 3, p. 141, the appellate court cannot review the written charges requested by the appellant.

The judgm’ent of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hallmark v. State
101 So. 905 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Cobb. v. State
93 So. 925 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 So. 689, 17 Ala. App. 57, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-walker-alactapp-1919.