Wright v. Waggoner

1920 OK 384, 193 P. 982, 80 Okla. 56, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 146
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 14, 1920·No. 9687·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

This cause was submitted April 20, 1920. In accordance with a stipulation duly filed plaintiffs in error were granted 30 days from that date within which to file their brief. On May 26, thereafter, plaintiffs in error were granted a further extension of 30 days. No briefs having been filed in the cause within the extensions of time granted and no further time having been requested (47 Oklá. vi; 165 Pac. vii), the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 Pae. 880; Cantwell ‘v. Patterson, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 754; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10.

RAINEY, C. J., and HARRISON, KANE. PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, McNEILL, BAILEY, and COLLIER, JJ., concui;.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Waggoner, 1920 OK 384, 193 P. 982, 80 Okla. 56, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 146 (Okla. 1920).

1920 OK 384 (Wright v. Waggoner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen. v. Tittmann
75 P.2d 701 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1938)
Jefferson County Excise Board v. Stanolind Pipe Line Co.
1937 OK 584 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Lougee v. New Mexico Bureau of Revenue Commissioner
76 P.2d 6 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1937)
Evans v. Norvell
1924 OK 327 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)