Wright v. Visiting Nursing Ass'n of WNY, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wright v. Visiting Nursing Ass'n of WNY, Inc.

295 A.D.2d 943, 743 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6322

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 295 A.D.2d 943 (Wright v. Visiting Nursing Ass'n of WNY, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Visiting Nursing Ass'n of WNY, Inc., 295 A.D.2d 943, 743 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J.), entered October 25, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion for an order of resolution and for sanctions.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: “Trial courts have broad discretion in supervising disclosure and, absent a clear abuse of that discretion, a trial court’s exercise of such authority should not be disturbed” (Gadley v U.S. Sugar Co., 259 AD2d 1041, 1042). Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for an order resolving in plaintiffs favor an issue raised during the deposition of defendant’s employee (see CPLR 3126 [1]) and awarding sanctions against defendant and its attorney. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J.), entered October 25, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion for an order of resolution and for sanctions.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: “Trial courts have broad discretion in supervising disclosure and, absent a clear abuse of that discretion, a trial court’s exercise of such authority should not be disturbed” (Gadley v U.S. Sugar Co., 259 AD2d 1041, 1042). Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for an order resolving in plaintiffs favor an issue raised during the deposition of defendant’s employee (see CPLR 3126 [1]) and awarding sanctions against defendant and its attorney. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 943, 743 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-visiting-nursing-assn-of-wny-inc-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack