Wright v. United States
86 Ct. Cl. 764, 84 Ct. Cl. 630, 1937 WL 1641
This text of 86 Ct. Cl. 764 (Wright v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wright v. United States, 86 Ct. Cl. 764, 84 Ct. Cl. 630, 1937 WL 1641 (U.S. 1937).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Mr. Justice Stone delivered a separate opinion, in which Mr. Justice Brandéis concurred, holding:
That “the legislation now in question did not become a law, not, as the Court holds, because the bill vetoed by the President was returned to the Senate within the ten-day period or to any person authorized to receive the bill in its behalf, but because the Senate by its adjournment prevented the return and thus called into operation the provision that the bill ‘shall not be a law’ where adjournment prevents its return to the house in which it originated, within the ten days allowed to the President to sign or disapprove it.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 Ct. Cl. 764, 84 Ct. Cl. 630, 1937 WL 1641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-united-states-scotus-1937.