Wright v. United States
This text of 19 C.M.A. 328 (Wright v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
A general court-martial at Fort Hood, Texas, convicted the petitioner in 1954 of rape after he and an accomplice lured the victim from her home by informing her that her husband had been injured on maneuvers and offering to take her to him in the field. The court sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for twenty years, and total forfeitures.
The petitioner has applied to this Court for extraordinary relief based on [329]*329the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969), and his assertions that the offense for which he was convicted had no military significance.
Mercer v Dillon, 19 USCMA 264, 41 CMR 264 (1970), holds that the principle of the O’Callahan opinion applies only to those cases still subject to direct review by this Court on the date of that opinion. The result in Mercer dictates the disposition of this petition, which is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 C.M.A. 328, 19 USCMA 328, 41 C.M.R. 328, 1970 CMA LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-united-states-cma-1970.