Wright v. Thomas

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 2000
Docket99-21174
StatusUnpublished

This text of Wright v. Thomas (Wright v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Thomas, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-21174 Conference Calendar

SYLVESTER LEON WRIGHT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOMMY THOMAS; ANDY BERNO; A. MURPHY, Deputy,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-3086 -------------------- August 22, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sylvester Wright appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against the Sheriff of Harris County, a

court clerk, and a deputy. He argues that the district court

erred in dismissing his suit without giving Wright notice of

intent to dismiss or a hearing pursuant to Spears v. McCotter,

766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).

The district court did not err in dismissing Wright’s suit.

Even if Wright’s “motion to stop harassment and threats” is

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-21174 -2-

viewed as a supplemental pleading, this motion, Wright’s original

complaint, and Wright’s appellate brief demonstrate no set of

facts under which Wright could obtain relief against the named

defendants. See Black v. Warren, 134 F.3d 732, 733-34 (5th Cir.

1998); Barrientos v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 911 F.2d

1115, 1116 (5th Cir. 1990). Consequently, Wright’s motion for

appointment of counsel is DENIED and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wright v. Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-thomas-ca5-2000.