Wright v. The Intrepid

45 F. 775, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedMarch 28, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F. 775 (Wright v. The Intrepid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. The Intrepid, 45 F. 775, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260 (E.D.N.Y. 1891).

Opinion

Benedict, J.

In my opinion the cause of the collision which gave rise to this action was a sudden sheer of the Morrisiana, improperly taken under the stern of the ferry-boat ahead of her, and when the Intrepid was so near that it was impossible thereafter to escape collision. An effort has been made to locate the place of this sheer at a great distance from tho ferry-boat, but the effort has failed. It is impossible for tho Morrisiana, in my opinion, to escape the effect of the sworn statement of Capt. Geer, her master, made tho next day after tho collision, wherein he says: “When within about a hundred feet of the stern of the ferry-boat, we ported our helm. As we passed the stem of the ferryboat, we discovered the tow.”

The libel must bo dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F. 775, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-the-intrepid-nyed-1891.