Wright v. Tatarian

131 So. 133, 100 Fla. 1366
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 24, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, arid briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, *1367 therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Crackwaner v. Carlton Natl. Bank, 98 Fla. 792, 124 So. R. 275, and Edgar v. Bacon, 97 Fla. 679, 122 So. R. 107.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Tatarian, 131 So. 133, 100 Fla. 1366 (Fla. 1930).

131 So. 133 (Wright v. Tatarian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgar v. Bacon
122 So. 107 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Cracowaner v. Carlton National Bank
124 So. 275 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)