Wright v. . Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rd. Co.

26 N.E. 1107, 124 N.Y. 668, 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1459
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1891·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Follett, Ch. J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. . Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rd. Co., 26 N.E. 1107, 124 N.Y. 668, 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1459 (N.Y. 1891).

26 N.E. 1107 (Wright v. . Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert L. Preston v. United States
696 F.2d 528 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Baxter v. State
189 Misc. 525 (New York State Court of Claims, 1947)
Hartzell v. Village of Hamburg
155 Misc. 345 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)
Collins v. State
103 Misc. 217 (New York State Court of Claims, 1918)
Moses v. Teetors
57 L.R.A. 267 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1902)
Henry v. Agostini
33 N.Y.S. 37 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)