Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co.
66 A. 417, 69 N.J. Eq. 837, 3 Robb. 837, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 143
This text of 66 A. 417 (Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co., 66 A. 417, 69 N.J. Eq. 837, 3 Robb. 837, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 143 (N.J. 1906).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Grey.
[839]*839For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill—-,13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 A. 417, 69 N.J. Eq. 837, 3 Robb. 837, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-stone-harbor-improvement-co-nj-1906.