Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co.

Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co.

66 A. 417, 69 N.J. Eq. 837, 3 Robb. 837, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 143
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 2, 1906·Published

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Grey.

[839]*839For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill—-,13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co., 66 A. 417, 69 N.J. Eq. 837, 3 Robb. 837, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 143 (N.J. 1906).

66 A. 417 (Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.