Wright v. Steed

10 La. Ann. 238
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 La. Ann. 238 (Wright v. Steed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Steed, 10 La. Ann. 238 (La. 1855).

Opinion

Slidell, O. J.

The appellant, Joseph L. Richmdson, filed a third opposition, claiming title to certain lands, which the plaintiffs were proceeding to have sold as the property of the succession of William Steed.

[239]*239The court below declared the judicial sale, under which the third opponent claimed, invalid, and set it aside. In this we think the court did not err. The application for sale made by W. B. Richardson in the mortuoria, and the subsequent order and proceedings under which the sale was made to J. L. Richardson., were, so far as we are informed by the record, entirely ex-parte and without notice to the curatrix of the succession or creditors, among whom were the present plaintiffs. Comparing the price of adjudication with the appraisement, there was an enormous sacrifice.

The succession has not appealed, and the third opponent is without interest to litigate the correctness of the judgment as between plaintiffs and the succession.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seal v. Banes
1934 OK 299 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Phelan v. Wilson
38 So. 570 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 La. Ann. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-steed-la-1855.