Wright v. State
This text of 2010 WY 94 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER AFFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE or tHE District Court
[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has failed to file a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. On April 15, 2010, appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel filed a "Motion to Withdraw as Counsel," pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 LEd.2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the "Anders brief" submitted by counsel, this Court entered its "Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw," on April 27, 2010. That Order provided that the District Court's October 27, 2009, "Judgment and Sentence on Jury Verdict" would be affirmed unless, on or before June 11, 2010, the appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court that the captioned appeal is not wholly frivolous. Taking notice that the appellant, Johnny A. Wright, has failed to file a brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the Court finds that the district court's "Judgment and Sentence on Jury Verdict" should be affirmed. It is, therefore,
[¶2] ORDERED that the District Court's October 27, 2009, "Judgment and Sentence on Jury Verdict" be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
DATED this 30th day of June, 2010. BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 WY 94, 234 P.3d 1228, 2010 Wyo. LEXIS 98, 2010 WL 2601478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-wyo-2010.