Wright v. State

324 S.W.2d 883, 324 Tex. Crim. 883, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2509
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 1959·No. 30809·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is under Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., for the giving of a worthless check in the amount of $15, with punishment assessed at 30 days in jail and a fine of $25.

The complaint upon which the information is based fails to allege that the check was given with intent to defraud. The intent to defraud is an essential element of the offense. Art. 567b, Sec. 1, supra; Kuykendall v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 607, 160 S.W.2d 525. Being an essential element of the offense, such intent should have been alleged in the complaint. Browder v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 375, 292 S.W.2d 342, and McCormick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 323 S.W.2d 462.

A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Addison v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 283 S.W.2d 55.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 324 S.W.2d 883, 324 Tex. Crim. 883, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2509 (Tex. 1959).

324 S.W.2d 883 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burleson v. State
403 S.W.2d 143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Parsons v. State
398 S.W.2d 283 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Richardson v. State
332 S.W.2d 736 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)